This user hasn't shared any biographical information
Posted in FOID on May 1, 2017
If you appealed your FOID revocation or denial to the Director of the Illinois State Police (“ISP”) and are still waiting on a ruling on your appeal, you are not out of options.
I get a lot of calls about appeals to the Director. The common complaint is that people send their appeal to ISP and wait for months, but never hear back. For example, one person got no response for 6 months despite repeat calls to ISP before considering legal action.
My first thought on seeing this trend was to remind people that they have to follow the State Police instructions re: Appeal to the letter. I have since learned that following the instructions does not speed up the process. Thankfully, the ISP appeals process is not the end of the road.
ISP’s failure to act on an appeal arguably constitutes a constructive denial of your appeal, especially where months have passed with no response. ISP’s decision is subject to judicial review pursuant to Section 11 of the FOID Act (430 ILCS 65/11). Accordingly, a Circuit Court may review ISP’s decision (or lack thereof) and order the FOID be reinstated if ISP’s denial or revocation was in error.
I handle FOID appeals at all stages, and have had success in litigation against the State Police on administrative review and all the way up to the Appellate Court. For more information, please give my office a call.
DISCLAIMER: past performance does not guarantee future results, and every case is unique. This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.
A recent opinion from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals suggests that the 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) federal firearms prohibition should not apply to convictions that are not for serious offenses.
In Binderup v. Attorney General, the Third Circuit held that the Federal Gun Control Act’s section 922(g)(1) prohibition was unconstitutional as applied to the challengers, who had been convicted of corrupting a minor and unlawfully carrying a handgun without a license. The Court found that the challengers’ convictions were not for “serious” offenses, and set out factors for determining whether an offense is serious enough to justify loss of the offender’s second amendment rights.
Binderup suggests that persons convicted of nonviolent misdemeanors who receive a sentence on the lower end of the applicable sentencing range are good candidates to seek relief in Federal Court. If your FOID has been denied or revoked under similar circumstances, seeking relief in federal court may be an option for you.
New FOID Law Makes ISP Report Firearms Disqualification to Local Law Enforcement to Encourage FOID Seizure
Posted in FOID on December 29, 2016
On January 1, 2017, the ISP will be required to forward notice of FOID prohibitions and revocations to local law enforcement agencies.
Public Act 099-0787 requires the Illinois State Police to give such notice “to all law enforcement agencies with jurisdiction to assist with the seizure of the [prohibited] person’s Firearm Owner’s Identification Card.”
On its face, the bill is calculated to prevent retention of FOID cards by people who have been rendered ineligible by a prohibition and/or revocation. However, my fear is that this will lead overzealous local law enforcement to conduct warrantless searches and/or seizures of firearms. Prohibited persons could then be prosecuted for possession of the firearms. The situation becomes even more complicated where a prohibited person lives with other gun owners who remain eligible to possess firearms.
In this post, I offer one lawyer’s perspective on field sobriety tests. I can’t tell you how to beat field sobriety tests. But I hope to help you better understand field sobriety testing so you can make an educated decision should you be asked to perform any of the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests.
Posted in Uncategorized on December 23, 2016
I have been relatively quiet about FOID cases, but the recent news is good.
In Tazewell County, my client was granted court-ordered reinstatement of his FOID. The client’s FOID was revoked for a drug-related charge, and he had been determined to be a “person addicted to narcotics” or “unlawful user of narcotics” by the Illinois State Police. My client was shown not to be a drug user at the hearing.
In the 5th District Court of Appeals, my client’s objection to the State Police’s Motion for Summary Reversal was granted, and a briefing schedule was set. The State Police had requested reversal of the trial court’s Order granting reinstatement of my client’s FOID, arguing that the trial court lacked jurisdiction. My client’s objection was well taken, and the State Police motion was denied.
Posted in Uncategorized on August 1, 2016
One of the most daunting questions on the minds of my DUI clients is “will I go to jail for this?” The answer depends on a number of factors, but primarily on your criminal background.
First determine if you are a first offender. If you have ever been convicted of DUI, you are not a first offender. Note that this differs from “first offender” for purposes of statutory summary suspension (SSS) proceedings, which define first offenders as persons convicted within the past 5 years. Do not be confused: any prior conviction in your lifetime means that you are not a first offender for purposes of the criminal DUI charge.
If you are a First Offender, it is unlikely that you will go to jail.
As a general rule, first offenders rarely receive jail sentences in DUI cases. In most cases, first offense DUIs are Class A misdemeanors, punishable by up to one (1) year in jail and a fine of up to $2,500. However, it is exceedingly rare for misdemeanor first offenders to wind up with a jail sentence. Importantly, the offender is also eligible for court supervision. In other words, a good plea deal can keep first offenders from being convicted in the first place.
That said, there are some important exceptions to be aware of. Illinois’ DUI statute contains several provisions which can modify a first offense to an aggravated DUI, i.e. a felony DUI. Because felonies carry harsher penalties than misdemeanors, aggravated DUIs naturally carry a greater risk of a jail sentence. Sentencing for aggravated DUIs will be explained in more detail below.
Common circumstances which may turn a first offense DUI into an aggravated DUI include:
- Committing the violation in a vehicle that is not covered by a liability insurance policy.
- Committing the violation without a valid driver’s license or permit.
- Violations resulting in accidents which cause the death of another person, great bodily harm or permanent disfigurement to another, or bodily harm to a person under 16 who was being transported by the offender.
If you are not a First Offender, it is more likely that will receive a jail sentence.
Illinois law imposes harsher penalties on DUI offenders with prior DUI convictions.
Absent aggravating circumstances, 2nd offense DUIs are Class A misdemeanors and are unlikely to carry mandatory jail sentences. The offender is often given the choice between a short jail sentence or a large number of hours of community service work.
- Misdemeanor 2nd offenses carry a mandatory minimum sentence of either 5 days in jail or 240 hours of community service in addition to any other penalties.
- The presence of aggravating circumstances can enhance the statutory penalty and may call for a mandatory jail sentence. For example, convictions for misdemeanor 2nd offense DUIs where the defendant’s BAC was 0.16 or higher (i.e. twice the legal limit) carry a mandatory minimum sentence of 2 days in jail and a mandatory fine of $1,250 in addition to any other penalties.
Felony First or Second Offenses (Aggravated DUIs):
- Aggravated first or second offense DUIs are Class 4 felonies. In Illinois, class 4 felonies are punishable by one (1) to three (3) years in prison.
- A sentence of probation or conditional discharge on an aggravated DUI will allow the offender to dodge the lengthy period of imprisonment imposed by the felony sentencing provisions. However, anyone sentenced to probation or conditional discharge for an aggravated DUI must serve a minimum of either 10 days of imprisonment or 480 hours of community service. See 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)(3).
- A third DUI is a class 2 felony and carries a sentence of not less than three (3) years in prison, and up to seven (7) years.
- If the offender’s BAC was 0.16 or more, the offense carries a mandatory minimum of 90 days imprisonment and a minimum fine of $2,500 in addition to other penalties.
- The offender remains eligible for a sentence of probation or conditional discharge, but must then serve either 10 days in jail or 480 hours community service.
Fourth or Subsequent DUI:
- A fourth or subsequent DUI are offenses for which a sentence of probation or conditional discharge may not be imposed. In other words, conviction will carry the lengthy period of imprisonment found in the felony sentencing provisions.
- A fourth DUI is a class 2 felony for which a sentence of not less than three (3) years in prison will be imposed, and up to seven (7) years.
- A fifth DUI is a class 1 felony for which a sentence of not less than four (4) years in prison will be imposed, and up to fifteen (15) years.
- A sixth or subsequent DUI is a class X felony for which a sentence of not less that six (6) years in prison will be imposed, and up to thirty (30) years.
Felony DUIs and Extended Term Eligibility:
It is important to note that the above felony sentencing ranges do not contemplate extended term eligibility. An offender facing a felony charge for which she is eligible for extended-term sentencing will face a much higher sentencing range. For example, an extended term class 2 felony carries a sentence of seven (7) to fourteen (14) years in prison, as compared to the 3 to 7 year range for standard class 2 felonies.
Posted in Uncategorized on June 29, 2016
You just got pulled over and got a traffic ticket. The cop explains to you that if you just plead guilty and pay the fine, you don’t have to appear in court. This is terrible advice, and here’s why:
In Illinois, the average true cost of a 15 m.p.h. speeding ticket is $744 in extra car insurance payments.
Pleading guilty to a traffic ticket (or failing to appear in court) will result in a conviction. And a conviction means that your insurance company can raise your insurance rates. Paying the fine or failing to appear is very likely to make your car insurance premium more expensive.
How Long Will a Traffic Conviction Affect my Monthly Car Insurance Premiums?
The answer to this depends on your provider, but a good rule of thumb is that your Illinois provider will keep a traffic conviction in their system for 5 years. Every policy is different, so contact your car insurance provider to find out how long a ticket will affect your policy.
How Much Will a Speeding Ticket Raise My Premium?
Again, the answer depends on your policy and provider. But research shows that a speeding ticket for 15 m.p.h. over will raise an Illinois driver’s premium by 12.5% per year on average. The average increase for an Illinois drivers’ premium after a 15 m.p.h. ticket is $124.80 per year. In other words, a 15 m.p.h. speeding ticket will cost $744 in extra car insurance payments. In Decatur, the true cost of a 15 m.p.h. speeding ticket was $771.60.
How Can I Keep a Traffic Ticket from Raising my Car Insurance Premium?
The answer is simple: don’t get convicted. A sentence of court supervision will result in no conviction if the driver does not get another ticket during the period of supervision. This is why I always push for supervision or amendment of the ticket to a nonmoving violation.
As I frequently explain to traffic clients: in the vast majority of cases, my modest fee for traffic cases more than pays for itself in the long run. Pleading guilty looks like an easy out, but don’t be fooled; it can cost you in the long run, and it probably will.